NOTABLE CASES

Walmart’s First-Ever Securities Settlement Totals $160 Million

POSTED NOV 5 2018

SETTLEMENT AMOUNT

$160 Million

(Awaiting Court Approval)

COURT

USDC – Arkansas (Western)

Note: largest securities settlement in Arkansas Federal Court

CLAIM DEADLINE

TBD

CASE SUMMARY

The complaint alleges Defendants engaged in unlawful and unethical conduct. During the Class Period, Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding Walmart’s practices with respect to unlawful or unethical conduct. Specifically, the Company failed to disclose that its executives had been involved in a multi-million-dollar bribery scheme at Walmart’s Mexican subsidiary, Wal-Mart de Mexico (“Walmart Latin America”). As a result of Defendants’ false statements, Walmart’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $62.48 per share on February 17, 2012.

On April 21, 2012, The New York Times published an article reporting that Walmart had “shut . . . down” an investigation concerning evidence that Walmart Latin America had engaged in “widespread bribery,” which included a paper trail of hundreds of suspect payments totaling more than $24 million. The article reported that top executives at Walmart and Walmart Latin America knew about but disregarded the bribery scheme.

As a result of this news, Walmart’s stock plummeted $2.91 per share to close at $59.54 per share on April 23, 2012, a decline of nearly 5% on volume of 38 million shares. The stock dropped again on April 24, 2012, to close at $57.77 per share on volume of 30 million shares, and on April 25, 2012, fell to $57.36 per share on volume of 28 million shares, as investors absorbed this shocking news.

Walmart is now the subject of a probe in Mexico by Mexican authorities and the subject of criminal and congressional investigations in the United States.

According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the Defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, included that the Company had violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in connection with the bribery payments and that Walmart management did not address ethical concerns in a “timely and effective manner” as represented by Defendants. As a result of Defendants’ false statements, Walmart stock traded at artificially inflated levels during the Class Period. However, after the above revelations seeped into the market, the Company’s shares were hammered by massive sales, sending them down nearly 5% from their Class Period high.

CLASS DEFINITION

On behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart” or the “Company”) publicly traded common stock during the Class Period

CLASS PERIOD

December 8, 2011 – April 20, 2012

FILING DATE

May 7, 2012

CLAIM ADMINISTRATOR

TBD

LEAD COUNSEL

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd

INSTITUTIONAL LEAD PLAINTIFF

City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System

Never miss an opportunity for recovery.

Learn more about this settlement and how SCAS can help your organization participate.

Contact Solutions Expert

Thanks for your interest. Fill in all the required information and we'll get back to you shortly.
Marketing and Communications Email Opt–in*
Please wait...

Start typing and press Enter to search